Judicial reform in Ukraine: the certainty of a categorical apparatus

The article highlights normative-legal and theoretical-methodological approaches to understanding the legal categories concepts of judicial reform in Ukraine.
 It is established that reform, first all, needs appropriate scientific support, particular with regard clear definition its subject development a conceptual categorical apparatus, given lack regulatory number important terms, primarily such as «judicial system», authority», «justice «judiciary», which are repeatedly used relevant reformation provisions.
 purpose establish concept relationship through prism analysis their further development.
 also current legislation Ukraine does not contain normative definitions «justice», even though it actively uses them, carrying out regulation relations field judiciary status judges. In literature, these terms sometimes without specifying definition, close connection between them meaningful interdependence, forming synonymous line from them. Simultaneously, comply provisions criteria logic, rationality non-contradiction, need distinguish has been proven, having identified for distinction.
 According results legislative doctrinal solving this problem, expediency recognizing category system» comprehensive category, will include system systems other institutions related authority (Public prosecutor’s office, Bar, enforcement decisions), functionally ensure implementation, substantiated. proposed rename Chapter VIII Constitution «Justice System», administration justice requires proper organization power, implementation by courts specially authorized bodies institutions, totality interrelationships constitute system, includes institutional, functional elements organizational aspects.